The above video is unfortunately titled.
Here's my summary of the video:
Trusting what pastors say about the KJV because we don't know Greek.
Helping people who are wrong.
Don't argue.
Archaic words vs Archaic definitions.
"...if with your tongue you utter speech that is not intelligible, how will anyone know what is said? For you will be speaking into the air." 1Cor 14:9 ESV
Edification requires inteligibility.
The KJV isn't fully inteligible.
2... The KJV is the hardest translation to understand.
3... NKJV
4... Is there stuff missing from modern translations?
5... How to talk to people about the KJV
6... Questions and stuff
Pray for understanding before reading.
Do what the Bible says.
Follow the Holy Spirit's leading.
Try a different English Bible translation.
Audio bible
Chronological bible
Film adaptation, like The Chosen
Bible app on your phone
Read the passage in multiple translations, like at biblehub.com.
Bible study software
Buy an ebook reader like a Kindle.
Read out loud.
Read with your family.
Discuss Bible passages with others.
Read at a different time of day.
Study instead of just reading.
A translation should be transparent.
I think the best way to describe these words is that they are a "secret code".
You don't know what they mean unless you know the KJV definitions.
"Secret code" words are very easy to misunderstand, because they are modern words that we still use.
We think we know what they mean.
Obsolete words in the KJV are easy to identify, because we don't know what they mean.
But we may read right over "secret code" words without even knowing it.
The most important thing about the Bible is to read it and do what it says.
The most important difference between different bible translations is literal vs paraphrase and gender.
The most important thing about the KJV is "Understandest thou what thou readest?".
This is a reading comprehension issue, not a spiritual issue.
I grew up with the KJV, memorized it and thought I understood it.
Also, is our familiarity with the KJV an advantage or a disadvantage?
If you follow the old paths...
...watch out for ruts.
17 Missing Verses in the NIV? (YouTube)
B... Almost all modern translations use different manuscripts than the ones that the KJV is based on.
C... Manuscripts have mostly tiny differences or errors called textual variants.
D... Less than 1% of all the textual variants significantly affect the meaning of the overall Bible.
Ignorance of Greek and Hebrew
Ignorance of Bible transmission
Not "researching" stuff we don't know
Kids and adults misunderstanding the KJV
Mistrusting the scientific consensus on scientific issues that the Bible doesn't specifically address
Not using multiple translations because of mistrust, misunderstanding or ignorance of modern translations and paraphrases
Not realizing the limits of your personal knowledge
Not reading the Bible
Ignorance of how to evaluate sources and contradictory claims
Ignorance of how to discuss controversial issues
Defending your viewpoint instead of looking for the truth
Overemphasis of religion instead of Jesus
Overemphasizing fear of man rather than fear of God
Not relying on the Holy Spirit
If you want to know what you don't know...
...Read the translators' preface to a bible
...Or check out the footnotes in the NET Bible
...Or the footnotes in the Lexham English Bible
Is your viewpoint more logical than the other side's viewpoint?
Is it more biblical?
Have you thought through why you believe what you do?
Or are you just attacking the other side?
There are two sides, but we're on the same side.
Are you looking for the truth?
Or are you trying to win an argument?
Are you emotional about the issue?
When people tell me I'm wrong, I only get upset if I'm wrong.
If I've done nothing wrong, why would I get upset?
Emotions are diagnostic.
They reveal what is important to you.
Are you worried that your viewpoint may be wrong?
...And that you may need to admit that you were wrong all these years?
The message is more important than the messenger.
Liberals can be good textual critics and translators.
Professional ethics demand the textual critic and translator translate accurately, regardless of any bias.
Correcting the error is better than attacking the source.
There's plenty of facts to go around.
Facts are better than opinions.
Questions are better than opinions.
Consensus carries more weight than a minority opinion.
Information is good.
More information is better.
Information that challenges your worldview is best.
Unchurched people aren't familiar with biblical concepts. There's a Hebrew and Greek culture gap with any bible translation. The KJV introduces an unecessary English culture gap.
Overview of the KJV only movement:
Exhaustive info on King James Onlyism:
Questions:
2... What does the Bible say about the Bible?
3... Is it appropriate to update the Bible?
Isn't it inspired and inerrant already?
4... Are there mistakes in the Bible?
5... What's the difference between the KJV and NKJV?
7... Is Mark Lehigh a reliable source of information?
8... Is science opposed to faith?
Do you have to understand Greek or Hebrew to understand the Bible?
Did the KJV utilize textual criticism?
Are bible translations getting more liberal over time?
Is modern textual criticism liberal?
What was the KJV translated from?
What are modern translations translated from?
Do textual critics follow "pet" manuscripts instead of following the majority of manuscripts?
9... Flesch-Kincaid scores the KJV at a fifth-grade reading level.